| 摘要: |
| 文章提出以主要经济海产品为锚定的海域资源定价机制，包括理论基础、定价方法、价格调整机制等内容，这为我国海域资源市场化配置提供一种有效工具，用以解决我国海域资源市场化配置过程中存在的问题。文章得出海域资源的价值属性分为内生价值和使用价值，内生价值具有向使用价值内部的传导过程，这是海域资源的定价基础；海域资源价格应包含当时海域资源价值的全部内容，且能够充分表现出海域资源使用价值的理论基础。在以上理论研究的基础上，文章建立了包括海域资源定价锚定海产品的品类、计价因子的定价方法。结果得到，2013—2017年我国海域资源基准价格应为0.102 1万元/（hm2·a-1），2018—2022年我国海域资源基准价格应调整为0.141 5万元/（hm2·a-1）。两者与国家开放式用海最低征收标准相比，涨幅分别为104.2%和182.9%。这说明我国海域资源的内在价值向使用价值传导不足，增强了海洋生态系统对海洋经济的外部效应，降低了海域资源的使用收益。 |
| 关键词: 海域资源定价 资源内生价值 资源使用价值 海域基准价格 海域价格调整机制 |
| DOI：10.20016/j.cnki.hykfygl.2025.06.010 |
| 投稿时间：2024-11-26修订日期：2025-05-08 |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学青年基金（42201070）. |
|
| Research and Application of Pricing Mechanism of Marine Resources Anchored by Main Economic Marine Products |
| LIU Xiaolu,ZHANG Pan,ZHANG Guangshuai,YAN Jishun |
| National Marine Environmental Monitoring Center |
| Abstract: |
| This paper proposes a pricing mechanism for marine resources anchored to key economic marine products, encompassing theoretical foundations, pricing methods, and price adjustment mechanisms. This mechanism provides an effective tool for market-oriented allocation of marine resources in China, addressing challenges encountered in the current allocation processes. The study identifies that the value attributes of marine resources consist of intrinsic value and use value, with intrinsic value transmitting into use value, a fundamental basis for pricing marine resources. The price of marine resources should reflect the total value at a given time and clearly demonstrate the theoretical basis for the use value of marine resources. Based on the theoretical research, this paper establishes a pricing method that includes categories of economic marine products as anchors and pricing factors. Results indicate that the benchmark price for China′s marine resources should be 0.1021million CNY/hectare per year from 2013 to 2017 and 0.141 5 million CNY/hectare per year from 2018 to 2022. Compared with the minimum national charge standards for open-use marine areas, these prices represent increases of 104.2% and 182.9%, respectively. This discrepancy suggests insufficient transmission of the intrinsic value of marine resources into their use value, enhancing the external effects of marine ecosystems on the marine economy and reducing the usage benefits of marine resources. |
| Key words: Pricing of sea area resources , Endogenous value of resources ,The use value of resources,Benchmark price of sea area,Sea area price adjustment mechanism |
